Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Anthony Ayala v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 20-55981
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. and U.S. XPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY AYALA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Anthony Ayala v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 20-80108
Respondent:
U.S. XPRESS, INC. and U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Petitioner:
ANTHONY AYALA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
U.S. Xpress, Inc. v. IXTUS Enterprises Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00219
Defendant:
Brandon A. Cerda, Does, IXTUS Enterprises Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Anthony Ayala v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 17-80157
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ANTHONY AYALA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. and U.S. XPRESS, INC.
NT AND S ENTERPRISE, LLC v. U.S. XPRESS, INC.
as 3:2017cv03287
Plaintiff:
NT AND S ENTERPRISE, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Ayala v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 17-80004
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ANTHONY AYALA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. and U.S. XPRESS, INC.
In Re: U.S. Xpress Enterprises, et al
as 16-507
Petitioner:
In re: U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. and U.S. XPRESS, INC.
Respondent:
KEITH SALINAS
Ajinomoto Windsor, Inc. v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Ajinomoto Windsor, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
U.S. Xpress, Inc. v. Arts Rapid Trucking, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01287
Defendant:
Arts Rapid Trucking, LLC, Does and Luis Ordonez
Plaintiff:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
U.S. Xpress, Inc. v. Arts Rapid Trucking, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00315
Defendant:
Arts Rapid Trucking, LLC, Does and Luis Ordonez
Plaintiff:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
