Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lenair v. Agalando et al
as 3:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Flecia Lenair
Defendant:
Charles Agalando, U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. Individually doing business as Variant, U.S. Xpress, Inc. Individually doing business as U.S. Xpress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Thomas et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Defendant:
Stephen C. Hite, U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Chretien, Leroy J. Thomas and Tommy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frenchwood et al v. Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group Inc et al
as 6:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Frenchwood, Linda A. Frenchwood, Anthony R Frenchwood and others
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Holston, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton v. US Xpress Inc et al
as 3:2019cv03006
Defendant:
Markethe Dewayne Becan, U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lanata v. Greendahl et al
as 2:2019cv09823
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., Robert Greendahl and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lanata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tostado v. U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01623
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tostado
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Ladew v. McCroy et al
as 3:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Adam Ladew
Defendant:
Michael McCroy, Mountain Lake Risk Retention Company, Paccar Financial Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Freeman et al v. U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04363
Plaintiff:
Glen Freeman and Valerie Freeman
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. , Allen C. Beck, II and Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
