Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Bennett v. REEDEREI RUDOLF SCHEPERS GMBH & CO KG et al
as 0:2019cv62839
Defendant:
Maersk Line A/S Co., The Shopping Metal, U.S.A., Inc., PETER DOHLE SCHIFFAHRTS KG and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burrows v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2019cv11359
Plaintiff:
Walter Burrows and Walter D. Burrows
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riedlinger v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05770
Plaintiff:
Susan Riedlinger
Defendant:
Offshore Service Vessels, LLC, Galliano Marine Service, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Volter v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
as 2:2017cv01936
Plaintiff:
Timothy Volter
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Diaz vs. Chevron USA, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
Antonio Diaz
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fornah v. Tetra Applied Technologies, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14354
Plaintiff:
John Fornah
Defendant:
Tetra Applied Technologies, LLC, Alliance Offshore, L.L.C. , Coiled Tubing Services and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Berrios-Santiago v. Baja Ferries U.S.A L.L.C. et al
as 3:2016cv02548
Defendant:
Baja Ferries U.S.A L.L.C., Baja Ferries S.A. de C.V., ABC Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ruben Berrios-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeaux v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12318
Plaintiff:
Isaac Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Jade Marine Inc
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Mathis v. GIS Marine, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06950
Defendant:
GIS Marine, L.L.C. , Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron Chemical Company, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2016cv00453
Plaintiff:
Hosea Wilson and Shajuan Turner
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
