Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kulikowski v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2020cv01160
Defendant:
Jared Polis, U.S.A., Jason Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Jaimie Kulikowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill, et al v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, et al
as 11-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA J. HILL and YOLANDA CHACON-VALLE, on Behalf of the New Mexico Educational Retirement Fund and its Members and Beneficiaries, or Alternatively on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
VANDERBILT CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, VANDERBILT FINANCIAL, LLC, VANDERBILT FINANCIAL TRUST and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and DOES 3-100, inclusive
Hentges v. Girl Scouts of the U.S.A., et al
as 10-1456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HENTGES, Individually and in behalf of my children: B.W.H., T.J.H., N.A.H., C.M.H., and A.N.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
GIRL SCOUTS OF THE U.S.A., et al., KATE GENAITIS, Individually and in her official capacity as Consultant to the State Councils, GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO and others
Kautz v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2010cv00619
Plaintiff:
Richard Kautz
Defendant:
Blitz U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Hentges v. Girl Scouts of the U.S.A., et al
as 10-1427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HENTGES, Individually and in behalf of my children: B.W.H., T.J.H., N.A.H., C.M.H., and A.N.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
GIRL SCOUTS OF THE U.S.A., KATE GENAITIS, Individually and in her official capacity as Consultant to the State Councils, GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO and others
Hentges et al v. Girl Scouts of the U.S.A. et al
as 1:2010cv02072
Plaintiff:
John (I) M. Hentges and John M. Hentges
Defendant:
Girl Scouts of the U.S.A., Kate (I) Genaitis, Kate Genaitis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mack v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2008cv00541
Plaintiff:
Brenda R Mack
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
