Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MacuLogix, Inc. et al v. Heru, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01734
Plaintiff:
MacuLogix, Inc. and The UAB Research Foundation
Defendant:
Heru, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Illumina, Inc. et al v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. et al
as 3:2016cv00477
Plaintiff:
Illumina, Inc. , University of Washington and UAB Research Foundation
Defendant:
Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. and Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01800
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The and UAB Research Foundation, The
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Cardiac Pacemakers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama on behalf of one of its subdivisions, the University of Alabama at Birmingham et al v. Medtronic Inc
as 2:2014cv01799
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama on behalf of one of its subdivisions, the University of Alabama at Birmingham and The UAB Research Foundation
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oregon Health & Science University v. Tranzyme, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00548
Plaintiff:
Oregon Health & Science University, Oregon Health & Science University and Oregon Health & Science University
Defendant:
Tranzyme, Inc., Tranzyme Pharma, Inc., University of Alabama at Birmingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The et al v. Idenix Pharmaceuticals et al
as 2:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The, Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The, UAB Research Foundation, The and others
Defendant:
Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Idenix Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
