Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dyrian Strong v. J. Grimes, et al
as 17-51134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DYRIAN K. STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN J. GRIMES, UNIT MAJOR KIMBERLY GARZA, CAPTAIN FNU VELLA and others
Roberts v. Whitfield et al
as 4:2016cv00009
Defendant:
Patricia Chapa, Administrative Assis Florinda P. Fierro, Unit Major Kimberly Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Franklin v. Glen Whitfield, et al
as 15-51001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK D. FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GLEN WHITFIELD, ROGER BOWERS, UNIT MAJOR KIMBERLY GARZA and others
Darrell Roberts v. Lynaugh Unit Facility, et al
as 15-51000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNAUGH UNIT FACILITY, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, GLEN WHITFIELD and others
Ramroop v. Sellers
as 4:2015cv00036
Notice Only Party:
Gloria Chandler, Leddocket and Elizabeth Mejia
Defendant:
Unit Major Kimberly Garza and Michele Sellers
Plaintiff:
Gobin Ramroop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Roberts v. Lynaugh Unit Facility, et al
as 15-50446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNAUGH UNIT FACILITY, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, GLEN WHITFIELD and others
Strong vs Grimes et al
as 4:2015cv00009
Defendant:
Unit Major Kimberly Garza, Warden J. Grimes, FNU Quintila and others
Plaintiff:
Dyrian Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin et al v. Whitfield et al
as 4:2014cv00065
Defendant:
Unit Capt. Kevin Blackshear, Roger Bowers, Unit Major Kimberly Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Franklin, Andrew D. McGrew, Jr., Stephen Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
