Cases 1 - 10 of 98
CLAYMAN v. UPS WORLDWIDE EXPRESS et al
as 2:2024cv08903
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION(S), JOHN DOE(S), UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SCOTT v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv07134
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS 1-10
Plaintiff:
HANEEFAH SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
KOGAN et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv06437
Plaintiff:
FELIKS KOGAN and BEATA KOGAN
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
OLDHAM v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv06173
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Plaintiff:
AARON DOMINICK OLDHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
BARDELLINI et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06177
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOE 1-50, fictitious names true identities unknown and ABC CORP. 1-10 fictitious names true identities unknown
Plaintiff:
TERESA BARDELLINI and LUIS BARDELLINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
IDI v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05771
Plaintiff:
ELIYAHU IDI
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JANE DOE, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ZEMEL v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ZEMEL
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
