Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner: WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent: ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party: BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant: ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 19-8014
Petitioner: WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: KROGER COMPANY, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party: BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant: ALLERGAN, PLC, LUPIN LTD., WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION and others
Respondent: AHOLD U.S.A., INC.
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and others
City of Providence, RI, et al v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1250
Plaintiff: PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Liti, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2071
Plaintiff: PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself andall others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10474
Plaintiff: SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10440
Plaintiff: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MORGAN v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10441
Plaintiff: HEATHER MORGAN
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10442
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10452
Plaintiff: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. , Impax Laboratories, Inc. , Lupin Limited and others
Respondent: SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10439
Plaintiff: LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?