Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Mitch Goree et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02147
Plaintiff:
Mitch Goree and James Wherry
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , Ken Harms and Jack McDowell
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Teamsters Local Union 480 v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local Union 480
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Basic v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01382
Plaintiff:
Admir Basic
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Rodney Dwayne Owens
Miscellaneou:
Danny Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02365
Plaintiff:
Len R. Lee
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Gregory Scott Reid
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02031
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
