Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tillman v. Procare Pharmacy Direct LLC, incorrectly sued as CVS Pharmacy INC et al
as 1:2019cv05219
Defendant:
Procare Pharmacy Direct LLC, incorrectly sued as CVS Pharmacy INC, United Parcel Service Co. and United Parcel Service of America INC
Plaintiff:
Leonard Tillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LB Surgery Center, LLC v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03073
Plaintiff:
LB Surgery Center, LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and Dan Dismukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Amos v. UPS Ground Freight et al
as 3:2010cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ronald Amos
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, United Parcel Service Inc and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Koenig et al v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jerome Koenig and Jeanette Koenig
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., United Parcel Service Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Narkiewicz-Laine v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
as 3:2008cv50259
Plaintiff:
Christian K. Narkiewicz-Laine
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
