Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00884
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DENOYER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Petitioner:
DALE ERNEST DENOYER
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ELLIS v. LANGER et al
as 1:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
MICHAEAL BEALS ELLIS
Defendant:
MARK J. LANGER, IRS COMMISSIONER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DWAILEEBE v. MARTINEAU et al
as 1:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
GARY DWAILEEBE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MARTINEAU, CAROLINE CIRAOLO-KLEPPER, COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HEARD v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL DIVISION, U.S. CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. JARVIS et al
as 1:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEALS ELLIS
Defendant:
DAVID L. JARVIS, JOHN PARKER, COMMISSIONER, IRS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DEPOLO v.CIRAOLO-KLEPPER et al
as 1:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
LOUIS RONALD DEPOLO
Defendant:
CAROLINE CIRAOLO-KLEPPLER and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MCNEIL v. IRS COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2015cv01288
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MCNEIL
Defendant:
IRS COMMISSIONER and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PEREZ et al v. RYAN et al
as 1:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
SANTOS PEREZ and ADAN BAMACA CAJAS
Defendant:
PAUL RYAN, KEVIN SEIFERT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GBIKPI v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2014cv01564
Plaintiff:
KOFFI M. GBIKPI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
