Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01511
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dean Himbler Aviles v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2019cv01723
Respondent:
John T. Lemaster, Jackie Lacey, United States Marshals Service and others
Petitioner:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. United States Marshals Service Agents et al
as 3:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kyle James
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service Agents, K. Laney, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrells v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Shannon Sorrells
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Chorrizon Healthcare, Rounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrells v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2015cv01725
Petitioner:
Shannon Sorrells
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard Pulley v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 2:2015cv06668
Defendant:
Bruce Clark, Bruce Clark, Jack Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Pulley
Pulley v. United States Marshal Service, et al.
as 2:2015cv01834
Plaintiff:
Richard Pulley
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Bruce Clark, Jason Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Wright v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2014cv01450
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice and United States Marshals Service
Petitioner:
Harold L Wright
Hernandez v. Ahern et al
as 3:2013cv03314
Petitioner:
Alonzo J. Hernandez
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern, United States Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Estes v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 2:2013cv00946
Plaintiff:
Dennis Estes
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, David Bower, Stephanie Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
