Cases 1 - 10 of 952
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Michael E. Horowitz, O.I.G, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5058
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Michael Evan Horowitz, Department of Health and Human Services and others
YARULLINA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
ILMIYA YARULLINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DIRECTOR JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
USA v. Bryan Burwell
as 24-3017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bryan Burwell, also known as Bush
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5303
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael J. Horowitz, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozina Muthoka v. League of Nations, et al
as 23-5300
Plaintiff:
Rozina Kimani Muthoka
Defendant:
League of Nations, United Nations, United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
