Cases 21 - 30 of 708
Snead v. United States of America Armed Forces et al
as 7:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
United States of America Armed Forces, Commander & Cheif and Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snead v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Waldron v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Rondell Waldron
Defendant:
J.C. Streeval, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Meyers v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Carroll v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Joseph T. Carroll, Sr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00219
Petitioner:
Cheron Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
