Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Shaheed v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2012cv02375
Petitioner:
Abdul Shaheed
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Warden, USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Furnari v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2012cv02378
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Warden, FCI Allenwood
Petitioner:
Christopher Furnari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2012cv02051
Plaintiff:
Ronald Richard Smith
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIvor v. Strada et al
as 3:2012cv00353
Petitioner:
Donald McIvor
Respondent:
Frank Strada and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Quinjano v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2011cv00367
Petitioner:
Freddy Aguilera Quinjano
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRUZ v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2010cv07087
Plaintiff:
CARLOS CRUZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alden v. Warden, U.S. Penitentiary Allenwood et al
as 3:2010cv02381
Petitioner:
Terrance K. Alden
Respondent:
Warden, U.S. Penitentiary Allenwood and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRADER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2010cv04997
Petitioner:
OSSIE ROBERT TRADER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alden v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2010cv01862
Petitioner:
Terrance K. Alden
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
