Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brown v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2020cv05624
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Brown
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
SCALIA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2020cv00138
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SCALIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
LOCAL 308, NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 5:2019cv01612
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 308, NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Johnson v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2017cv01557
Plaintiff:
Asia Johnson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2017cv01385
Plaintiff:
Tyra Johnson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powers v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv01749
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Powers
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and National Association of Letter Carriers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Bey v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Shemorat Gareem Bey
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PITTSBURGH METRO AREA POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2012cv00811
Plaintiff:
PITTSBURGH METRO AREA POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO and AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
FILIPOVITS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 5:2011cv03355
Plaintiff:
LEO A. FILIPOVITS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRITTINGHAM v. LOCKSMITH et al
as 2:2009cv04863
Plaintiff:
DENISE BRITTINGHAM
Defendant:
LOCKSMITH, UNITED STATE POSTAL SERVICE, AMTRAK and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
