Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JONES v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC D/B/A ALLIED UNIVERSAL
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JONES
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE LLC doing business as ALLIED UNIVERSAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Universal Protection Service, LLC v. Bohling et al
as 1:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as Allied Universal Security Services
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Bohling, Kelvin N. Smith and Bohling Protective Service, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bouvier v. City of Covington, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04597
Defendant:
Allied Universal Corp., City of Covington, Georgia, Police Chief Stacey L. Cottton and others
Plaintiff:
London R. Bouvier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomas-Contreras v. Universal Protection Service, LLC
as 2:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lomas-Contreras
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as Allied Universal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04989
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Universal Protection Service, LLC v. EKG Security, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Jeffrey Darley and EKG Security, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Universal Protection Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
