Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hoffman v. Unknown Agents et al
as 3:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hoffman
Defendant:
Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allee v. Barr et al
as 7:2021cv00084
Defendant:
The House Senate, Corrections Information Council Office, Washington, DC, J. Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Justin J. Allee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pilenza v. Driscal
as 7:2020cv00765
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Pilenza
Defendant:
CT Police, Unknown Agents of Fairfield and Judge Driscal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. McClendon et al
as 3:2020cv00544
Plaintiff:
Titus Lee
Defendant:
Jason McClendon, Adam Ulery and Unknown Agent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Gothic Beauty Magazine et al
as 3:2017cv00446
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Gothic Beauty Magazine and Unknown Agent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans, Jr. v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
William H. Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Unknown Agent' (s) of United States and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stallworth v. Majors et al
as 7:2011cv00389
Defendant:
Todd Brewer, Dalton Majors and Unknown Agents
Plaintiff:
Douglas Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Five Unknown Agents
as 1:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Five Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newbrough v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2010cv00867
Plaintiff:
Jack Newbrough
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Ernest L. Toney, Joanna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bukhari v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 1:2009cv01270
Plaintiff:
Farhan Bukhari
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Kevin Hicks, Winston Chow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
