Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Silas v. City of New York
as 23-7227
Plaintiff / Appellant: REYNOLD B. SILAS
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF YONKERS, CITY OF YONKERS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Detective CAVE, of The City of Yonkers Police Department (Shield # unknown) and others
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOE, shield # unknown, individually and in his official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02528
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kraft v. The City of New York
as 19-2844
Defendant: Police Officers, Individually and in their official capacity, Unknown New York State Law Enforcement Officers or Agents or Employees and Unknown officials and employees of the New York State Intelligence Center (NYSIC Fusion Center) and New York State, Unknown Federal Law Enforcement Officers or Agents or Employees of the F.B.I., National Security Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Warren R. Kraft
Defendant / Appellee: Richard Roes, Supervisor police officers of the City of New York, the identity and number of whom is presently unknown, City of New York and John Does, Police Officers and non-uniformed Police Employees of the City of New York, the identity and number of whom is presently unknown individually and in their official capacity
McGrier v. City of New York
as 19-2665
Defendant / Appellee: John Moore, Individually, in his official capacity, John Cordero, in his official capacity, Correction Officer Daniel Robles, Individually, Shield# 13214 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Freddie McGrier
Silas v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv07122
Defendant: The City of Yonkers Police Department, The Home Depot, Inc. d/b/a Home Depot, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Reynold B Silas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
In Re: Justin Orden
as 17-1054
Petitioner: Justin Orden
Respondent: Cornell University and Brandon Frisbie, Individually and as an Employee of Cornell University
Defendant: John Doe I, Individually, and as an Employee of Cornell University, John Does, presently unnamed and unknown individual and Jane Does, presently unnamed and unknown individual
Conte v. County of Nassau We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-869
Plaintiff - Appellee: Anthony Conte
Defendant: Larry Guerra, City of New York, Rhoda Zwicker, Individually and as a Clerk in the Nassau County District Attorney's Office, Nassau County, New York and others
Defendant - Appellant: Bob Emmons, Individually and as Assistant District Attorney of Nassau County, New York, William Wallace, Individually and as Assistant District Attorney of Nassau County, New York and Mike Falzarno, Individually and as Special Investigator for the Office of the District Attorney of Nassau County, New York
Conte v. County of Nassau
as 13-3054
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony Conte
Defendant - Appellee: County of Nassau, New York, Nassau County District Attorney's Office, Denis E. Dillon, Individually and as Former District Attorney of Nassau County, New York and others
Stanczyk v. City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anna Stanczyk
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Richard DeMartino, Police Officer, Shielf 12739, Shuan Grossweiler, Police Officer and others
Cannistraci v. Kirsopp
as 12-2784
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sebastiano Cannistraci
Defendant - Appellee: Rodger Kirsopp, Individually and as an agent, servant, and/or employee of the State of New York, John Doe, whose name is presently unknown, Individually and as an agent, servant and/or employee of the State of New York and Richard Roe, whose name is presently unknown, Individually and as an agent, servant and/or employee of the State of New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?