Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAYLOR v. MAZZONE et al
as 2:2015cv06682
Plaintiff:
MISHA TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSEPH MAZZONE , UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP , FRANCES MCELHENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2015cv01519
Plaintiff:
MARY E. PRICE
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
PRICE et al v. UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
MARY PRICE and JAMES HORTON
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
PRICE et al v. UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2013cv03803
Plaintiff:
MELANIE N. PRICE and MARY E. PRICE
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT, LAW OFFICES OF ILENE YOUNG, HOLSTEN & ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAHAM-FAISON v. UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2012cv06643
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GRAHAM-FAISON
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT, DANIEL MCGARRY, MARTHA MENZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NAYLIS et al v. UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2010cv05935
Plaintiff:
PATRICK NAYLIS , MICHAEL COOGAN and MATTHEW C. HENEGHAN
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT , JAMES WIGO , LOU DEVLIEGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE LANDTEK GROUP, INC. v. UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2009cv02666
Plaintiff:
THE LANDTEK GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
