Cases 11 - 20 of 22
GUST v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv01143
Defendant:
BOB VOGEL, JESSIE K. LIU, UNITED STATES DEPT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SAUNDERS et al v. FLOWERS-CONTI et al
as 1:2014cv00870
Plaintiff:
HENRY SAUNDERS, ALBERT RANIERI, JAMES WHITTED and others
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS-CONTI, KEITH A. PESTO and W.D. PENNSYLVANIA ASSISTANT US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORBEY v. WARDEN, DC JAIL et al
as 1:2014cv00196
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent:
Lane and US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01623
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WILSON v. GEITHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01605
Plaintiff:
FRANK H. WILSON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, JOHN BOEHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HUDSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01193
Petitioner:
LEE O. HUDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , US ATTORNEY GENERAL and GREGORY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRAHAM v. BLEDSOE et al
as 1:2011cv00149
Respondent:
B. A. BLEDSOE and US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JERRY T. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HICKMAN v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT et al
as 1:2010cv01005
Plaintiff:
DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT, FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2010cv00647
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINNAVAIA v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2008cv02098
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D. PINNAVAIA
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
