Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Cuara R. v. Cayman National Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Cayman National Bank, Scotiabank Cayman Islands, HSBC Bermuda Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Daybreak Utah Homes et al
as 2:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Daybreak Utah Homes, Miller Real State Group, Station at Gardner Mill Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gannon v. US Bank, Inc. (US Bancorp)
as 2:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Taura Gannon
Defendant:
US Bank, Inc. (US Bancorp)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gannon v. US Bank
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Taura Gannon
Defendant:
US Bank, Inc. (US Bancorp)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Minnig v. Select Portfolio Servicing et al
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Shane Edward Minnig
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Halliday Watkins & Mann, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fitch v. US Bank
as 4:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ann Fitch
Defendant:
US Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Balderas et al v. Fay Servicing et al
as 2:2020cv00089
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Fay Servicing, Lundberg and Associates and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Alvarez, Juan Balderas and Carola Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. US Bank NA
as 2:2020cv00048
Plaintiff:
Cameron Williams
Defendant:
US Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Wicker v. Bayview Loan Services et al
as 4:2019cv00088
Petitioner:
James B. Wicker
Respondent:
Bayview Loan Services and US Bank
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
