Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VIRAL v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
PATEL VIRAL
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ICE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20649
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
ONTANO-ANTUNEZ v. SUTANTO et al
as 5:2019cv00340
Defendant:
SUTANTO and US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff:
BRAUIO ONTANO-ANTUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. US Department of Homeland Security
as 0:2018cv62048
Plaintiff:
Dmitri K. Green
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00407
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Abraham Teklemariam v. Heath Simon
as 17-12987
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABRAHAM GEBREZGABIHER TEKLEMARIAM
Respondent - Appellee:
HEATH SIMON, HQ Rio Chief, US Department of Homeland Security
Abdala v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv20448
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Aden Mohamed Abdala
Defendant:
US Attorney General , Us Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohamed Mohamud v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2016cv23162
Plaintiff:
Yunus Mohamed Mohamud
Defendant:
United States Attorney General , Krome Service Processing Center , L. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
