Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kane et al v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 9:2022cv81287
Plaintiff:
Brian Patrick Kane, Zayne Aneed Elias Otero, Camilo Andres Orozco Elias and others
Defendant:
Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, Gabriel Gonzalez, Director Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VIRAL v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
PATEL VIRAL
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ICE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
