Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Emrit v. Providence Housing Authority, et al
as 17-1110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, RHODE ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY and US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
US v. Ndaula
as 15-2029
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEXANDER NDAULA, a/k/a Money Mals, a/k/a Mal, a/k/a Mals
Interested Party:
GMAC, FANNIE MAE and US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Castillo Condominium v. HUD
as 15-1223
Petitioner/Cross-Respondent:
CASTILLO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Respondent/Cross-Petitioner:
US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Secretary
:
CARLOS TORO VIZCARRONDO and CARLO GIMINEZ BIANCO
One and Ken Valley Housing, et al v. ME State Housing Authority, et al
as 12-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ONE AND KEN VALLEY HOUSING GROUP, TWO AND KEN VALLEY HOUSING GROUP, THREE AND KEN VALLEY HOUSING GROUP and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ME STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02714
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
U.S. Department of Housing v. Astralis Condominium Assoc.
as 09-2589
Interested Party:
CARLOS GARCIA-GUILLEN and SONIA VELEZ AVILES
Petitioner:
US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Respondent:
ASTRALIS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Astralis Condominium Assoc v. Garcia-Guillen, et al
as 09-2497
Petitioner:
ASTRALIS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
CARLOS GARCIA-GUILLEN, SONIA VELEZ AVILES and US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Kane v. US Dept. of Housing and Urban, et al
as 08-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT KANE
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC., WOODBOURNE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP., a/k/a Woodbourne Apts. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
