Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dillard v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F Dillard
Defendant:
United States, US Marshals, Deborah Gresham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dillard v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Dillard
Defendant:
United States of America, US Marshals, Kassandra McGrady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. US Marshal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00280
Plaintiff:
Thomas Braden Austin
Defendant:
US Marshal Service and Bob Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. US Marshal Service et al
as 1:2013cv00466
Petitioner:
Perry Lee Lewis
Respondent:
US Marshal Service, United States of America and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Havins v. Sproat et al
as 1:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Anthony Havins
Defendant:
Patty Sproat and US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Oviedo v. US Marshals et al
as 1:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Irma Oviedo
Defendant:
US Marshals, FBI, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Obiedo v. US Marshals Service et al
as 1:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Raul Obiedo
Defendant:
US Marshals Service, FBI, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strolberg, et al v. Akal Security, Inc., et al
as 1:2003cv00004
Plaintiff:
Ron Strolberg , Charles Hawkins , Carl Benjamin and others
Defendant:
US Marshals Service , Justice, US Dept of and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Quintana v. US Marshals Service
as 1:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jorge Flores Quintana
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marciel et al v. US Courts et al
as 1:2007cv00187
Petitioner:
Pablo Sotelo Marciel
Respondent:
Canyon County Detention Center, US Courts, US Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
