Cases 81 - 90 of 5,872
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williams v. Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
as 2:2023cv01949
Plaintiff:
Detrica D. Williams
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Noco Company v. Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Topdon and USA Topdon LLC doing business as Topdon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Pollock v. DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC
as 2:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
McKenzie Pollock
Defendant:
DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Daniels v. USA
as 2:2023cv01875
Petitioner:
Kevin Loren Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCloud v. Rust-Oleum Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Erica McCloud
Defendant:
Rust-Oleum Corporation, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Snowden v. USA
as 3:2023cv00154
Petitioner:
Dylan Jermaine Snowden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McClellan v. USA
as 2:2023cv01805
Petitioner:
Adam C. McClellan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
