Cases 81 - 90 of 139
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 13-3247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practitioner and others
Smith v. Shirk et al
as 3:2013cv01486
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Shirk, Warden Thomas, USP Lewisburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Martinez v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2013cv01475
Plaintiff:
Andre Martinez
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP - Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Derek Capozzi v. USP Lewisburg Warden
as 13-2330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK A. CAPOZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
USP LEWISBURG WARDEN
Tiffin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 1:2013cv00851
Petitioner:
Jason B. Tiffin
Respondent:
USP - Lewisburg Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bostic v. USP Lewisburg Staff et al
as 3:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bostic
Defendant:
USP Lewisburg Staff, M Kemmerer, J.E. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mark Jordan v. B.A. Bledsoe, et al
as 13-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
B.A. BLEDSOE, USP LEWISBURG and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jordan v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 3:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jordan
Defendant:
F.B.O.P., USP Big Sandy, USP Inez, KY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Naranjo v. Warden, USP Lewisburg
as 3:2012cv02612
Petitioner:
Rudy Naranjo
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaheed v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2012cv02375
Petitioner:
Abdul Shaheed
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Warden, USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
