Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 411
Savino Braxton v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 21-2595
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAVINO BRAXTON
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Karl Rominger v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 21-2527
Plaintiff / Appellant: KARL ERNST ROMINGER
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Jeffrey Smith v. A. Ciolli
as 21-16341
Petitioner / Appellant: JEFFREY SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN A. CIOLLI, USP Atwater
Danny Fabricant v. A. Miranda, et al
as 21-16345
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANNY FABRICANT
Defendant / Appellee: A. MIRANDA, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C-2 Case Manager, SHIRLEY BROWN, individually and in her official capacity as Unit C-2 Correctional Counselor, K. ADAMIEC, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C Manager and others
Johnson v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-3141
Petitioner / Appellant: DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: DONALD HUDSON, Warden, USP - Leavenworth
Victor NoveneIn re: Victor Novene
as 21-5719
Petitioner: In re: VICTOR LAMANS NOVENE
Respondent: WARDEN, ALLENWOOD USP
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners &, et al
as 21-2245
Defendant / Appellee: GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, A. DUTTRY, Health Service Supervisor USPLewisburg, GAUSTPH, Mail Room Supervisor USP-Lewisburg and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. A. King, et al
as 21-2246
Defendant / Appellee: HICKS, Lieutenant, Unit Case Manager USP-Lewisburg, MARR, Unit Counselor USP-Lewisburg, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 21-2243
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Tolbert v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-3102
Petitioner / Appellant: RICKEY WAYNE TOLBERT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: (FNU) HUDSON, Warden, USP Leavenworth

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?