Cases 61 - 70 of 411
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Robert Stanford v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 21-11882
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP II
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN STANFORD
Kevin Kerr v. Warden Allenwood USP
as 21-2029
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN KERR, a/k/a Allah
Charles Brooks v. Warden Allenwood USP
as 21-1936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP
Anthony Wainwright v. Warden, USP Coleman I
as 21-11518
Respondent / Appellee:
USP COLEMAN I WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WAINWRIGHT
Lawrence Howard v. Donald Hudson
as 21-1762
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE L. HOWARD
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HUDSON, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Jose Montalban v. John Doe, et al
as 21-11431
Defendant / Appellee:
BOLEY, MARK TIDWELL, Doctor (MDO) at USP Coleman I, FNU MCLEAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE MONTALBAN
Sherille Harris v. Megan Brennan
as 21-1936
Defendant / Appellee:
Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General USPS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sherille Harris
Eric Gooch v. S. Young, et al
as 21-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC GOOCH
Defendant / Appellee:
S. YOUNG, Correctional Lieuttenant USP/Terre Haute and J. WILSON, Correctional Officer USP/Terre Haute
Michael Greene v. USA, et al
as 21-5398
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA HIRST, Officer, Big Sandy USP (FNU), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LIEUTENANT ARMES, Big Sandy USP (FNU) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GREENE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
