Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Perry v. Florence USP
as 1:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Gareth Lorenzo Perry
Defendant:
Florence USP, Lovett, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiah v. USP Florence
as 1:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Wade Quiah
Defendant:
USP Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Team Romeo, et al
as 22-1011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIE ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOE, Director Western Regional Office of the BOP, JOHN/JANE DOE, Designation Center D.S.C.C. "Team Romeo", MRS. DUBOIS, Unit Manager USP Florence and others
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Raynard Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Victorville Medical Department, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Health Service Administrators et al
as 1:2021cv01374
Defendant:
USP Lee, USP Coleman I, USP Atwater and others
Plaintiff:
Deric Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aloba v. Avant et al
as 5:2021cv00337
Defendant:
USPS, United States, Warden Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Aloba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Warden USP Florence
as 1:2021cv00616
Respondent:
Warden USP Florence
Petitioner:
Norman Shaw, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Tolbert v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv03054
Respondent:
(fnu) Hudson, United States of America and USP Leavenworth
Petitioner:
Rickey Wayne Tolbert, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Warden, USP-Leavenworth
as 5:2020cv03292
Petitioner:
Michael Jackson
Respondent:
Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
