Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Elrod v. Walker, et al
as 11-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY WAYNE ELROD
Defendant - Appellee:
(FNU) WALKER, Correctional Officer, USP-Leavenworth, in his official and personal capacity, MICHAEL C. GRAY, Correctional Officer, USP-Leavenworth, in his official and personal capacity, STEVEN L. LACY, Correctional Officer, USP-Leavenworth, in his official and personal capacity and others
Rodriguez v. Daniels, et al
as 11-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANIELS, Warden, USP Florence, "John Doe #1," Special Investigations Agent, USP Florence, "John Doe #2," Special Investigations Specialist, USP Florence, L.J. MILUSNIC, Assistant Warden, ADX Florence and D. SPROUL, Step-Down Program Unit Manager, ADX Florence
Wise v. Chester
as 10-3292
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD F. WISE
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE CHESTER, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Gillon v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INGMAR GILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN BLAKE DAVIS, US PENITENTIARY FLORENCE COLORADO and others
Rodriguez v. USP Leavenworth et al
as 5:2010cv03179
Plaintiff:
Frank Rodriguez
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth, C. Chester, J. Loftness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Fay v. Chester
as 10-3225
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEIGHTON FAY
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE CHESTER, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
McCarthy v. Warden
as 10-1347
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Florence
Saleh v. Davi
as 10-1297
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOHAMMED SALEH
Respondent - Appellee:
BLAKE DAVIS, Warden of USP-Max Florence
Westine v. (FNU) (LNU)
as 10-3168
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Respondent - Appellee:
(FNU) (LNU), Warden, USP-Leavenworth
McCarthy v. Warden
as 10-1255
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Florence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
