Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Ali v. English
as 17-3078
Petitioner - Appellant:
FALASHA ALI
Respondent - Appellee:
NICOLE ENGLISH, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Williams v. United States, et al
as 17-3025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, K. AULEPP, MD,DO, Clinical Director for the BOP, USP-Leavenworth, in her individual and official capacity, BLEVINS, Health Service Administrator, USP-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacity and others
Shehadeh v. English
as 17-3015
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMAL SHEHADEH
Respondent - Appellee:
N.C. ENGLISH, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
In re: Hanson
as 17-5005
Petitioner:
JOHN FITZGERALD HANSON
Respondent:
WILLIAM A. SHERROD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, USP Pollock LA; E. Scott Pruitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Alupe, et al
as 16-3372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
(FNU) ALUPE, Doctor, USPLeavenworth, CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USPLeavenworth, FNU LNU (1), Health Services Supervisor, USP Leavenworth and others
Boling v. Maye, et al
as 16-3192
Petitioner - Appellant:
OLIVER M. BOLING
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USP Leavenworth and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Watson v. Hollingsworth
as 16-3008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIERRE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSH EVANS, Senior Officer Specialist, USP-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacities
Proch v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 16-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAUREAN XAVIER PROCH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Fay v. Maye
as 15-3035
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEIGHTON FAY
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USP Leavenworth
McCoy v. Maye
as 15-3029
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USP Leavenworth
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
