Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Jeremy Pinson v. Estrada, et al
as 19-15601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, USP Tucson, ANN ASH, ENGLAND, named as FNU England and others
Adam Martin v. Unknown Party
as 19-15605
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Roscoe Chambers v. Poyner, et al
as 19-55280
Defendant:
FCI DOCTOR, ALLEN, HARDY, Senior Deputy and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE ESQUETINI, LEEN, POYNER, USP Health Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Brown v. USPS PMG
as 2:2019cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown, Jr
Defendant:
USPS PMG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adam Martin v. Unknown Party
as 19-15160
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Adam Martin v. USDC-AZT
as 19-70129
Undetermined:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Other:
In re: ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Petitioner:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 19-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCUM, CO, USP Tuscon, STANGL, WYNN, USP Tuscon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant:
LAUREN HOLLEY, Marshal, NEAMTU, CO, USP Tucson, GREG THIEL, Marshal and others
Donahoe v. Kautter et al
as 3:2018cv05631
Defendant:
Betts, Patterson, Mines P.S., Ferris Beverly Donahoe, Albertsons and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USPS Priority Express Mail Parcel with Tracking Number EL834219052US
as 5:2018mj00273
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
USPS Priority Express Mail Parcel with Tracking Number EL834219052US (1)
USA v. USPS Priority Express Mail Parcel with Tracking Number EL834219052US
as 5:2018mj00273
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
USPS Priority Express Mail Parcel with Tracking Number EL834219052US (1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
