Cases 61 - 70 of 135
Farr v. Warden of Marion USP et al
as 3:2020cv00808
Plaintiff:
Keenon J. Farr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of Marion USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis, Jr. v. Thomson
as 3:2020cv50002
Respondent:
USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Frankie Cornell Ellis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fonville v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv50324
Defendant:
Thomson USP Warden
Plaintiff:
Kendan Fonville
Respondent:
Chris Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quoyah v. Hudson
as 3:2019cv50291
Respondent:
Thomson USP Warden and Donald Hudson
Petitioner:
Gabriel Alexander Quoyah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harrison v. True et al
as 3:2019cv00509
Plaintiff:
Bertram Harrison
Defendant:
William True, USP Marion and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drew v. Vanord et al
as 3:2019cv00285
Defendant:
Ms. Byran, Mr. Thompson, USP Marion, Marion, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Andre' Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company a/s/o Adil S. Mufti v. Austin et al
as 1:2018cv05230
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company a/s/o Adil S. Mufti and State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
Defendant:
Donald E. Austin, USPS and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
United States of America v. The USPS Priority Mail Express package bearing tracking number EL837609959US
as 1:2018mc00148
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The USPS Priority Mail Express package bearing tracking number EL837609959US
Bradbury v. Bagwell et al
as 3:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
James Bradbury
Defendant:
Ms. Bagwell, Randall Pass, P.A. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al
as 1:2018mc00013
Plaintiff:
United States of America and USPS Priority Mail Package Bearing Tracking Number 9505510123668002042489
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
