Cases 111 - 120 of 124
Spencer v. Russo et al
as 1:2013cv00451
Plaintiff:
Addones Spencer
Defendant:
Kenneth Russo, Texas University Medical Branch, FCC Complex USP Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Fox et al
as 1:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Telly S Armstrong
Defendant:
John B Fox, FCC-USP Beaumont and Texas University Medical Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. USP Beaumont
as 1:2013cv00232
Petitioner:
George E Banks
Respondent:
USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Fox et al
as 1:2012cv00569
Plaintiff:
Lendro Michael Thomas
Defendant:
John Fox and USP Beaumont Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Fox et al
as 1:2012mc00010
Petitioner:
Harold Cox
Respondent:
John B Fox, USP Beaumont, Daniel Phillips and others
Al-Bizri v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2012cv00522
Petitioner:
Sultan Al-Bizri
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al v. Birmingham USPS, LLC et al
as 4:2012mc00008
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Receiver:
Gray and Associates, LLC, acting by and through its Principal, G. Richard Gray
Defendant:
Birmingham USPS, LLC, Douglas Customs, LLC, Sierra Vista DE, LLC dba Sierra Vista Agency, LLC and others
Schuett v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2011cv00382
Plaintiff:
Clifford Schuett
Defendant:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. USP Leavenworth et al
as 1:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Melvin Wilson
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth and FCI Beaumont - Medium
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Beaumont USP et al
as 1:2008cv00904
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dale Evans
Defendant:
Beaumont USP, Houston FDC, Seagoville FDC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
