Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Washington v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Daryl Vincent Xzavier Washington and Darryl Washington
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Ledford, Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00516
Petitioner:
Johnnie Edwards Banks, Jr.
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. USP Lee Warden
as 7:2022cv00512
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
USP Lee Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Copeland v. USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00499
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dewayne Copeland and Kent D. Copeland
Respondent:
Warden USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neal v. Warden of USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00287
Petitioner:
Phillip Lenard Neal
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ali v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Hassan Ali
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval, C. Cervantes, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rozier v. Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee et al
as 7:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rozier
Defendant:
Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee and Captain USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ferebee v. WRSP Doe et al
as 7:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Defendant:
WRSP Doe and USPS Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathews v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2021cv00609
Petitioner:
Leonard Mathews
Respondent:
Warden and Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rozier v. Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee et al
as 7:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rozier
Defendant:
Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee and Captain USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
