Cases 1 - 9 of 9
R&L Carriers Shared Services v. Utah Labor Commission, et al
as 26-4047
Plaintiff:
R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
UTAH LABOR COMMISSION and JACESON MAUGHAN
R&L Shared Services LLC v. Utah Labor Commission et al
as 2:2025cv00335
Plaintiff:
R&L Shared Services LLC
Defendant:
Utah Labor Commission and Jaceson Maughan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
R&L Carriers Shared Services LLC v. Utah Labor Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00866
Defendant:
Jaceson R Maughan and Utah Labor Commission
Plaintiff:
R&L Carriers Shared Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Cuara R. v. USSA Insurance Banking and Retirement et al
as 2:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
USSA Insurance Banking and Retirement, Workers Compensation of Utah, Geico Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archuleta v. Utah Worker Compensation Fund et al
as 2:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Archuleta
Defendant:
Utah Worker Compensation Fund, Miller Electric, Industrial Commission of Utah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Macquarie Mortgages USA v. Premier Title Insurance Agency et al
as 2:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Macquarie Mortgages USA
Defendant:
Premier Title Insurance Agency, Shane Norris, Dustin Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kivalu v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2010cv00622
Petitioner:
Taniela Fakalolo Kivalu
Respondent:
State of Utah, Utah County, Adult Probation & Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Bodell et al
as 2:2010cv00303
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Dennis J. Bodell, Roof USA, Homecomings Financial and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Utah Labor Commission v. Paradise Town et al
as 1:2008cv00158
Plaintiff:
Utah Labor Commission
Defendant:
Paradise Town and Lee Atwood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
