Cases 11 - 17 of 17
City of Bellbrook v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
City of Bellbrook
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
City of Fairborn v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
City of Fairborn
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Village of Bridgeport v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02638
Plaintiff:
Village of Bridgeport
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
City of Portsmouth v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
City of Portsmouth
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Nessel et al v. Chemguard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01080
Defendant:
Vulcan Fire Systems, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Dawn Chemical Corporation of Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel, State of Michigan and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nessel et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Hazard Control Technologies, Inc, DowDupont, Inc., Noble Industrial Supply Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The State of Michigan, Attorney General Dana Nessel, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, and the STATE of MICHIGAN, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Charvat v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01366
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Charvat
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
