Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Becker v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray, et al
as 22-4022
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LYNN D. BECKER
Defendant / Appellant:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe and a federally chartered corporation, UINTAH AND OURAY TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE and UTE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware LLC
Chegup, et al v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al
as 20-4015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNDA M. KOZLOWICZ, ANGELITA M. CHEGUP, MARY CAROL JENKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAUN CHAPOOSE, EDRED SECAKUKU, SAL WOPSOCK and others
Chegup, et al v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al
as 19-4178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNDA M. KOZLOWICZ, ANGELITA M. CHEGUP, MARY CAROL JENKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE FOR THE UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, LUKE DUNCAN, UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe and others
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al v. Lawrence, et al
as 16-4154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, and a federally chartered corporation, UINTAH AND OURAY TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE, Chairman of the Uintah and Ouray Tribal Business Committee and UTE ENERGY HOLDINGS, a Delaware LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE BARRY G. LAWRENCE, District Judge, Utah Third Judicial District Court, in his Individual and Offical Capacities and LYNN D. BECKER
Norton, et al v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah, et al
as 15-4170
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VANCE NORTON, GARY JENSEN, KEITH CAMPBELL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, BUSINESS COMMITTEE FOR THE UTE TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, in its official capacity, UTE TRIBAL COURT OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
