Cases 21 - 30 of 33
FIROVA v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02302
Plaintiff:
ESTHER KURCZYN FIROVA
Defendant:
SEAN PATRICK CUMMINGS, STEPHANIE MARIE CUMMINGS, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. BEYENE et al
as 1:2020cv01401
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and HAILE YOHANNES BEYENE
Plaintiff:
AMELIA BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GANTI et al v. UBER USA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00288
Defendant:
YENENEH DESTA BELAYENEH, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-DC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
M.D. VINU GANTI and USHA R GANTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KURTZ v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01670
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TSEHAY ASSETA BADEG, RASIER and others
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY KURTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRY v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01303
Plaintiff:
KELLY FRY
Defendant:
MICHELLE DAVIS and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00903
Defendant:
RAUL E. RODRIQUEZ VASQUEZ, RASIER-DC, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE SUBPOENA MATTER IN: MCKAY et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 1:2017mc02641
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MCKAY and JILLIAN MCKAY
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
RAHEJA v. ST. CLAIR et al
as 1:2017cv01915
Defendant:
MARCEL A. ST. CLAIR and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
PREKSHA RAHEJA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIEBER et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01763
Plaintiff:
MARIE BIEBER and MARTINA BIEBER
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , HARMANPREET SINGH and MICAH KIDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
