Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hamilton v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 23-1278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Demezz Hamilton
Defendant / Appellee:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Karlen v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 23-932
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carla R. Karlen
Defendant / Appellee:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Javier, John Doe 1-3 and Xavier Cabrera
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant:
Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Aleksanian v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 22-98
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Levon Aleksanian, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representatives, Sonam Lama, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representatives and Harjit Khatra, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representatives
Defendant / Appellee:
Uber Technologies Inc., Jointly and severally, Uber Logistik, LLC, jointly and severally and Uber USA LLC
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2752
Plaintiff:
Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ergo
Defendant / Appellant:
Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae:
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2750
Plaintiff:
Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ergo
Defendant / Appellant:
Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae:
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2752
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Third-Party-Defendant:
Ergo
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Kalanick
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2750
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Third-Party-Defendant:
Ergo
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Kalanick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
