Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BPi Bright Power, Inc. v. Umpqua Holding Corporation d/b/a Umpqua Bank et al
as 3:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
BPi Bright Power, Inc.
Defendant:
Umpqua Holding Corporation d/b/a Umpqua Bank and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Jones v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Cort L. O'Haver, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Wilson v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Fowler, Stephen M. Gambee and others
CICCOTELLI v. UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05610
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PEGGY YVONNE FLOWER, BRYAN L TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Mason v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10912
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane O'Haver and others
Green v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06729
Plaintiff:
Mike Green
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane OHaver and others
Mackie v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10237
Plaintiff:
Keith Mackie
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Neely v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10171
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Neely
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Columbia Banking System, Inc., Cascade Merger Sub, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
