Cases 21 - 30 of 331
Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah State Tax Commission, et al
as 21-4083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN L. VALENTINE, Commissioner and Chair of the Utah State Tax Commission and THE STATE OF UTAH
Not Yet Classified:
BEAVER COUNTY, BOX ELDER COUNTY, CARBON COUNTY and others
Union Pacific Railroad v. Sierra Pacific Power Company
as 2:2021cv00400
Defendant:
Sierra Pacific Power Company doing business as NV Energy
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joyce v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv01354
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Paul Joyce
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Pelto v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 0:2021cv00070
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Robert J Pelto, Jr
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Day v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2021cv01096
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Day and Wayne Day
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Adamson v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 4:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Richard Adamson
Defendant:
Kelly D Smith, Union Pacific Railroad and Lloyd Plymale
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Graves v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 4:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Billy Jack Graves
Defendant:
Kelly D Smith, Union Pacific Railroad and Lloyd Plymale
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Nance v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2020cv03613
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Charles Nance
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Harrison v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 1:2020cv03556
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Plaintiff:
Donald Harrison and Donald T. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
