Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Bonner v. Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program et al
as 3:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Bonner
Defendant:
Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program and Union Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bonner v. Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program et al
as 2:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Bonner
Defendant:
Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program, Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program, Union Pacific Flexible Benefits Program and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wagers v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2008cv06206
Plaintiff:
Rocky P. Wagers
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Stone v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv00449
Plaintiff:
David G. Stone
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Scott v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2007cv01767
Plaintiff:
Paige Scott and Paige Scott
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Venell Farms, Inc. et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al
as 6:2007cv06261
Plaintiff:
Venell Farms, Inc., Chintimini Land, Inc., Venell Pellets, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co., Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. and Willamette & Pacific Railroad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
McDaniel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2007cv06247
Plaintiff:
William R McDaniel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
