Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Barron v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Victor Barron
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Barron v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Victor Barron
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Aaron M. Jones
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056 Employers Liability Act - Personal Inj re Railroads (bringing an action)
Egemo v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jerry Egemo
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056 Employers Liability Act - Personal Inj re Railroads (bringing an action)
Pohle v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
Tess Pohle
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056
Sprinkel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Angela Sprinkel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2020cv03017
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nathan Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawler et al v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 4:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Lawler and Hannah Lawler
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad and Landus Cooperative
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056
Beving v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Beving
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
