Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United Parcel Service Inc v. NLRB
as 24-1530
Petitioner:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
NLRB v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Raj PatelIn re: Raj Patel
as 24-1337
Petitioner:
In re: RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
SHUGART v. PROVIDENT METALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04733
Plaintiff:
Stephan Shugart
Defendant:
PROVIDENT METALS, INC., A-MARK PREVIOUS METALS, INC., JIM BULLION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
Teamsters Local 177 v. United Parcel Service
as 19-3150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 177
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
SIACI SAINT HONORE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv13502
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
SIACI SAINT HONORE
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
GREENMAN INC. v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv05611
Plaintiff:
GREENMAN INC.
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON-WAY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
THE CLASSY COOK v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04759
Plaintiff:
THE CLASSY COOK
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON-WAY INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CHAMPION PARTS, INC. v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04650
Plaintiff:
CHAMPION PARTS, INC.
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AVERITT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PCM COMPANY v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04513
Plaintiff:
PCM COMPANY
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON-WAY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
