Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dixon et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Dixon, Sr. and Christina Dixon
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Robert C. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv02586
Plaintiff:
Peggy Young
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ahmed v. Schlling et al
as 1:2009cv03390
Plaintiff:
Atia T. Ahmed
Defendant:
Donald D. Shilling and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Liverpool v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al
as 1:2009cv00434
Plaintiff:
Darrell Liverpool and Darrell Liverpool
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wilson v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
as 8:2008cv02345
Plaintiff:
Arnold David Wilson
Defendant:
United Parcel Services, Inc. and United Parcel Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.