Cases 1 - 10 of 426
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BLAKEY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE BLAKEY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hernandez v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Yosvany Rodriguez, United Parcel Service, Inc., Coyote Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024mi00011
Plaintiff:
The Excellent The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
