Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CSAA Insurance Exchange v. United Pet Group, Inc.
as 4:2016cv03912
Plaintiff:
CSAA Insurance Exchange
Defendant:
United Pet Group, Inc. and Spectrum Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00878
Plaintiff:
Schools Insurance Association of Washington
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands, Inc, United Pet Group, Inc, Marineland, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schools Insurance Association of Washington v. Spectrum Brands Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00880
Plaintiff:
Schools Insurance Association of Washington
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands, Inc , United Pet Group, Inc , Marineland, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00879
Plaintiff:
Schools Insurance Association of Washington
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands, Inc, United Pet Group, Inc, Marineland, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hikari Sales USA, Inc. v. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05009
Plaintiff:
Hikari Sales USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., United Pet Group, Inc., Cobalt International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
United Pet Group Inc v. Wisepuppy.com et al
as 5:2014cv01498
Defendant:
Randall Myers, Wise Puppy LLC and Wisepuppy.com
Plaintiff:
United Pet Group Inc
Hohn v. Spectrum Brands, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brian Hohn
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands, Inc. and United Pet Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garmon Corporation v. United Pet Group Inc
as 2:2011cv05384
Plaintiff:
Garmon Corporation
Defendant:
United Pet Group Inc
Markos and Widly Inc v. United Pet Group Inc
as 2:2010cv09316
Plaintiff:
Markos and Widly Inc
Defendant:
United Pet Group Inc
Julio Rodriguez v. Spectrum Brands Inc et al
as 2:2010cv08637
Defendant:
Does, Spectrum Brands Inc and United Pet Group Inc
Plaintiff:
Julio Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
